tattoolounge-leipzig.de

.de crawl

First seen 2026-05-07 · Last seen 2026-05-07 · ok HTTP/1.1 200 481 ms crawled 2026-05-14

DE · 217.160.0.42 · AS8560 IONOS SE

Reputation 89/100 weak security headers dmarc monitor-only

Classifying

HTML metadata

Title
Bestes Tattoo Studio in Leipzig - Tattoo Lounge Leipzig
Description
Entdecken Sie das beste Tattoo Studio in Leipzig. Unsere erfahrenen Tattoo-Künstler kreieren einzigartige und atemberaubende Tattoo-Kunst. Termin Buchen!
Language
de
Generator
WordPress 6.9.4
Canonical
https://tattoolounge-leipzig.de/
Feeds

Open Graph

url
https://tattoolounge-leipzig.de/
title
Bestes Tattoo Studio in Leipzig - Tattoo Lounge Leipzig
locale
de_DE
site name
Tattoo Lounge Leipzig
description
Entdecken Sie das beste Tattoo Studio in Leipzig. Unsere erfahrenen Tattoo-Künstler kreieren einzigartige und atemberaubende Tattoo-Kunst. Termin Buchen!
updated time
2026-04-14T12:45:04+00:00

Technology

Server
Apache
CMS
WordPress
Analytics
  • Google Tag Manager
Fonts
  • Google Fonts

Third-party hosts loaded (3)

  • fonts.googleapis.com×2
  • www.googletagmanager.com×2
  • google.com×1

Social

Contact

Email
Phone
Address
Große Fleischergasse 4, 04109, Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

Registration

Updated
2024-04-16
Name servers
  • ns1016.ui-dns.org.
  • ns1073.ui-dns.biz.
  • ns1093.ui-dns.com.
  • ns1096.ui-dns.de.

DNS records live

NS
  • ns1016.ui-dns.org
  • ns1073.ui-dns.biz
  • ns1093.ui-dns.com
  • ns1096.ui-dns.de
MX
  • 10 mx00.ionos.de
  • 10 mx01.ionos.de
Verified for
  • Google
  • Pinterest

Email authentication partial

SPF
v=spf1 include:_spf-eu.ionos.com ~all
softfail (~all)
DMARC
v=DMARC1; p=none;
policy: none (monitoring only)
DKIM
no key found at common selectors

Certificate (current)

Sectigo Public Server Authentication CA DV R36
from 2026-01-07 to 2027-01-22
Expires in 246 days

HTTP security headers

Header hygiene 30/100 Checked live page: https://tattoolounge-leipzig.de/

findings
  • missing HSTS
  • missing Content Security Policy
  • missing frame protection
  • missing content type protection
  • missing Referrer Policy
  • missing Permissions Policy

Links to (5)

Linked from (1)